Background
The attainment of competence in consulting with patients is a central aim of medical students before graduation. Direct observation of complete consultations using a validated assessment instrument is the best method of judging this competence, but the need for several cases can pose problems with feasibility. The Leicester Assessment Package (LAP) has acceptable reliability and validity in the United Kingdom. The workshop reported on in this paper aimed to improve the teaching and assessment of consultation competence by clinical teachers.

Method
Twenty-two experienced South African medical educators participated in a three-day workshop. Their attitudes to the LAP and the forms of teaching that its use promotes were analysed by responses to pre- and post-workshop questionnaires with Likert-scale and free-text questions.

Results
The participants were positive about the LAP at the end of the workshop. They all believed that it was a useful instrument, and a majority would apply this method in their own departments. There were continuing reservations about the feasibility of the method and some respondents felt it would require some adaptation, particularly to the criteria for awarding grades.

Conclusions
The workshop participants learnt to use an instrument developed in the United Kingdom that encourages an analytical approach to the assessment and teaching of consultation skills. They believed it would be useful in the contexts in which they worked.